Synthetic Model of Bioethical Inquiry :: Biology

Bioethics and the Synthetic Model of Bioethical InquiryABSTRACT Bioethics, viewed as both a digit of reflective practice and a developing discipline, is concerned with the moralistic aspects of health care practice and research. With its steady maturation in the domain of moral discourse, bioethics has presided over a number of questions about the nature of human illness and how problems imposed by illness can be understood in an term marked not only by progress, but also by the concomitant fear that such progress will outstrip our humanity and our arrogance as persons. I discuss some of the current tensions and ambiguities inherent in the sketch of bioethics as it continues to mature. In particular I focus on the certify tendency in bioethics to bifurcate ethical theory and practice. I analyze some of the dichotomies resulting from such bifurcation. Finally, I call for an approach to bioethical discourse defined by the rigor of systematic and critical thinking characteristic o f ethical theory, the disciplined eloquence and persuasive power of rhetoric, and the principles of Renaissance humanism. A new model of bioethics is proposed, angiotensin-converting enzyme that synthesizes the analytic functions of moral theory with the practical and therapeutic functions of rhetorical humanism such a model bridges the divide between theory and practice. This celluloid model of bioethical inquiry emerges from both ancient and contemporary debates about the possibility and nature of moral knowledge as well as from the moral teachings of humanists and rhetoricians passim the history of ideas. The bioethics field has had an impressive impact on public, professional, and personal life in the last twenty five years. Bioethics, viewed as both a form of reflective practice and a developing discipline, is concerned with the moral aspects of health care practice and research. With its steady maturation in the domain of moral discourse, the field of bioethics has presided over a number of questions about the nature of human illness and how the problems imposed by illness can be understood in an get along marked not only by progress, but by the concomitant fear that such progress will outstrip our humanity and our dignity as persons. This paper attempts to sort out some of the current tensions and ambiguities inherent in the field of bioethics as it continues to mature. In particular it focuses on the present tendency in bioethics to bifurcate ethical theory and practice and analyzes some of the dichotomies which result from it.